Am 11.11.2008 8:51 Uhr schrieb "Andrew Beekhof" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why even bother with a group if you're going to set both > ordered="false" and collocated="false" ? > Because I want to reorganize my resources and constraints. I run NFS Service by linux-ha and I have a lot of Filesystem-Resources. The CIB is very confusing. I only want to simplify it to stay on top of things. But the Filesystem-Resources itself are independent from each other. I read in Michael Schwartzkopffs Linux-HA Book that defining a group with both attributes false is a possibility. Annette > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 16:20, Annette Jäkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am 10.11.2008 15:09 Uhr schrieb "Dominik Klein" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>>> Group definition within heartbeat 2.0.8: >>> >>> You should consider upgrading :) >>> >>>> <group ordered="false" collocated="false" id="group_Filesystems"> >>> >>> Try "colocated" with one "L". >>> >>> Regards >>> Dominik >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> >> colocated with one 'l' dont work. Group can not be activated. >> >> Hm, I have to think about upgrading... >> Annette >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
