On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Kukkala Prasad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Can I use heartbeat-2.1.3 with Pacemaker 1.0? > Or do I need to upgrade to higher version of heartbeat for cluster > communication? > From the "Versions and Compatibility" section of > http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install I can see that heartbeat 3 is tested > with Pacemaker 1.0. > So I think I should upgrade to heartbeat 3.
Correct. > > Do you suggest using OpenAIS instead of heartbeat for cluster communication? Personally, yes. But heartbeat will still work. > Does Pacemaker mandatorily need cluster file system like GFS? No. > We also have another clustering alternative s/w Red Hat Cluster Suite (RHCS). > What is your opinion about it? For the most part good, because we share some of the more important pieces. However Pacemaker's resource management capabilities are far superior. I also have to say nice things about RHCS because they pay my salary :-) > RHCS gives me impression that it is a commercial version of LinuxHA. Does > LinuxHA and RHCS has any relation? They're alternative solutions. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
