Hi Tim, do special reasons exist for using SLE HA? Are there some problems with linux-ha and SLES 11?
How is the support for SLE HA? (same as SLES 11)? Greetings Jochen Tim Serong schrieb: > On 11/27/2009 at 08:52 PM, Jochen Lienhard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hmmm ... I'm wondering. >> In the SUSE-Linux-Enterprise-High-Avail Repository i can find >> heartbeat-common >> >> Version: 2.99.3-14.1 >> Size: 757.0 K Media No.: 1 >> License: GPL v2 or later; LGPL v2.1 or later >> Package Group: Productivity/Clustering/HA >> Authors: Alan Robertson , Andrew Beekhof , Guochun Shi , Horms , Huang >> Zhen , Lars Marowsky-Bree , Sun Jiang Dong , (See doc/AUTHORS) >> >> So it seems to be a offcial supported part. >> > > heartbeat-common, despite the name, is *not* the heartbeat cluster/messaging > layer. This package contains only the resource agents, lrm & STONITH pieces. > In later releases it is (or will be) known as cluster-glue, to alleviate > this confusion (as Andrew mentioned, heartbeat is replaced by > openais/corosync in SLES11). > > >> Perhaps I should change my question: >> Which repository is better ... the >> SUSE-Linux-Enterprise-High-Availability or >> the >> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/SLE_11/x86_64 >> >> / >> > > If you're using SLES 11, go for the SLE HA extension. > > Regards, > > Tim > > > -- Dr. rer. nat. Jochen Lienhard UB Universität Freiburg Dezernat EDV Tel: (0761) 203-3908 Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
