On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Ciro Iriarte <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/1/25 Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]>: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Ciro Iriarte <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't the use of OBS solve this kind of issues?, you don't >>> actually need that distribution to build the packages.... >> >> Apart from being horribly slow and unreliable, OBS does not build >> against the latest SLES rpms. >> Which makes it pretty much useless for SLES10 > > Just out of curiosity, is there any dependecy on kernel or third party > packages (i mean, projects) version?.
Not really, but we've seen "weirdness" in the past when things are run against different versions to what they were built with. Then there's rpm complaining because the automatic dependancies does match exactly. Its just a whole can of worms I'd rather not open :-) Plus, Lars is pretty good at keeping things up-to-date > > Also, in the Advanced Build Target Selection you have this options: > > SUSE:SLE-10/standard > SUSE:SLE-10:SDK/standard > SUSE:SLE-10:SP2/standard > SUSE:SLE-10:SP2:SDK/standard > SUSE:SLE-10:SP3/standard > SUSE:SLE-10:SP3:SDK/standard > SUSE:SLE-11/standard > SUSE:SLE-11:SP1/standard > SUSE:SLES-9/standard Ah, that seems to be new. > Would be really nice to have it available on SLES also, but your time > is yours. Thanks a lot for your work and effort in this project. If there is a public repo that I can get the rpms from, as I can for EPEL, then adding SLES is easy. There is also the option of an interested third-party dropping the tarballs into the build service instead of me :-) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
