On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Robinson, Eric <eric.robin...@psmnv.com> wrote: > >>> That is pretty confusing to me because (1) people seem to say that >>> OpenAIS 0.80.6 (whitetank) is the way to go because the alternative >>> (wilson+flatiron) is not ready for prime time and also contains >>> features that many simple clusters don't need, > >> Which people say that? > > I was remembering this blog entry: > http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/205886990/advisory-dont-use-pa > cemaker-on-corosync-yet
ah that one, perhaps I should move the "update" to the top >>> and (2) the ClusterLabs page on >>> Pacemaker recommends that people use Pacemaker with OpenAIS (in >>> preference to heartbeat) and does not mention Corosync. > >>Yes, we need to update that. When that page was written there >>was no corosync, only later was it spun off into its own project. > > Thank God, that clears up a lot! I'm just a clueless noob with > Pacemaker, so any little thing like that throws me way off track. > > So then it's okay that when I installed Pacemaker, it also installed > corosync x86_64 1.2.0-1.el5? yes _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
