>>> Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> schrieb am 11.08.2011 um 07:57 in >>> Nachricht <CAEDLWG3UfkJsYf3x9CUu45K9vdO1rce7FF9V1sooHkdp_X=x...@mail.gmail.com>: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I frequently see problems I don't understand: > > When configuring an exportfs resource using "crm" shell without explicitly > specifying operations or timeouts, I get warnings like these: > > WARNING: prm_nfs_v03: default timeout 20s for start is smaller than the > advised 40 > > > > I wonder: If the default is "40s", > > It is not the default. > It is the recommended minimum for that operation on that resource.
OK, let's rephrase it: If there is an advertised minimum, and I do not specify a timeout, why isn't hat advertised minimum used (as a default)? Ulrich > > > and I specify none, why isn't that default used? > > Is it because CRM has ist own defaults? > > > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
