On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote: > On 9/18/2011 7:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk<dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> >> wrote: > ... >> No it means one of more filesystem_drbd and primitive_nfslock >> operations failed really badly on node1. >> Possibly it was the initial health check (to check it wasn't already >> running before the cluster started) and subsequent failed "stop". > > I'm sorry Andrew, but even if your explanation actually contained any > useful information ("something went wrong" isn't),
It contained as much useful information as could be provided based on the email you sent. All our crystal balls are currently being repaired I'm afraid. > it's a month out of date. I apologise if the death of my father was inconvenient for you. > I had it running the day I found 3.0.4 in epel -- in haresources > mode, so you're welcome to consider this a troll. > > Dima > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems