On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote:
> On 9/18/2011 7:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Dimitri Maziuk<dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu>
>> wrote:
> ...
>> No it means one of more filesystem_drbd and primitive_nfslock
>> operations failed really badly on node1.
>> Possibly it was the initial health check (to check it wasn't already
>> running before the cluster started) and subsequent failed "stop".
>
> I'm sorry Andrew, but even if your explanation actually contained any
> useful information ("something went wrong" isn't),
It contained as much useful information as could be provided based on
the email you sent.
All our crystal balls are currently being repaired I'm afraid.
> it's a month out of date.
I apologise if the death of my father was inconvenient for you.
> I had it running the day I found 3.0.4 in epel -- in haresources
> mode, so you're welcome to consider this a troll.
>
> Dima
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
