21.11.2011 01:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Andrew, >> >> Thank you so much for your response. My concern was elimination as >> much of cman as >> possible, > > Then don't use it at all. > >> since the goal was to run pacemaker on top of >> corosync/openais however, from >> Vladislav's last email, this is only possible with yet even more hacks. > > Not true. > SLES/openSUSE has supported cman-free clusters and cluster filesystems > for many years. >
I spoke to Dinar who does QA for cluster-related things at Suse, and he promised to try to reproduce that flaw with CPG_NODEDOWN and fencing. Otherwise, yes, you are absolutely correct. And I use the same things on fedora. Vladislav _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
