On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >>>> Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> schrieb am 28.11.2011 um 00:26 in >>>> Nachricht > <CAEDLWG0LxjrvRd0mOQEpe0NrY+-X=pslkxrn0lhpceady6q...@mail.gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Florian Haas <flor...@hastexo.com> wrote: >> > On 11/25/11 13:29, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > > [...] > >> > My understanding was that only probes would still occur (on >> > cluster-recheck-interval, or when new nodes joined the cluster). And I >> > maintain that that would be the intuitively "correct" behavior for >> > unmanaged resources. Andrew? >> >> No, any defined recurring monitors will still be executed. >> This allows a resource to accurately depend on the state of an unmanaged >> one. > > And therefore you need to monitor the _unmanaged_ resource? Strange.
Now is the point where you explain how the cluster going to know what state of the unmanaged resource, /without/ monitoring. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
