On 2012-03-14T11:41:53, William Seligman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm mindful of the issues involved, such as those Lars Ellenberg
> brought up in his response. I need something that will failover with
> a minimum of fuss. Although I'm encountering one problem after
> another, I think I'm closing in on my goal.
I doubt this is what you're getting. An active/passive fail-over
configuration would likely save you tons of trouble and not perform
worse, probably be faster for most workloads.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
