On 12/07/2013, at 8:23 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <bub...@hoster-ok.com> wrote:
> 01.07.2013 17:29, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to look if it is now safe to delete non-running nodes >> (corosync 2.3, pacemaker HEAD, crmsh tip). >> >> # crm node delete v02-d >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 7 v02-c >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 8 v02-d >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 5 v02-a >> WARNING: 2: crm_node bad format: 6 v02-b >> INFO: 2: node v02-d not found by crm_node >> INFO: 2: node v02-d deleted >> # >> >> So, I expect that crmsh still doesn't follow latest changes to 'crm_node >> -l'. Although node seems to be deleted correctly. >> >> For reference, output of crm_node -l is: >> 7 v02-c >> 8 v02-d >> 5 v02-a >> 6 v02-b >> > > With latest merge of Andrew's public and private trees and crmsh tip > everything works as expected. > The only (minor but confusing) issue is: > > [root@vd01-a ~]# crm_node -l > 3 vd01-c > 4 vd01-d > 1 vd01-a > 2 vd01-b > [root@vd01-a ~]# crm_node -p > vd01-c vd01-a vd01-b > [root@vd01-a ~]# crm node delete vd01-d > WARNING: "crm_node --force -R vd01-d" failed, rc=1 > > Looks like missing crm_exit(pcmk_ok) for -R in try_corosync(). Done. Thanks for testing. > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
