On 7 Jan 2014, at 6:27 pm, Ulrich Windl <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>>> Dimitri Maziuk <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> schrieb am 04.01.2014 um 18:39 in > Nachricht <52c8473b.8000...@bmrb.wisc.edu>: >> On 1/4/2014 10:39 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >>> On 2014-01-03T20:56:42, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> causing a lot of reinvention of the wheel. In the last 5~6 years, both >>>> teams >>>> have been working hard to unify under one common open-source HA stack. >>>> Pacemaker + corosync v2+ is the result of all that hard work. :) >>> >>> Yes. We know finally have one stack everywhere. Yay! >> >> Yah, ein stack uber alles! You'd note that even the cpu market has >> settled on two kinds of music, not one... > > It's getting off-topic, but very recently I discovered that some demo > software I wanted to try required SSE3E while my CPU only provides SSE3... I > mean: Which average user knows what command set extensions his CPU actually > supports? Maybe the war Intel vs. AMD starts a new round also ;-) It wouldn't be fair if we had all the fun
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
