29.10.2014 12:49, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: ...
>> On the other hand, this feature is relatively new (has it ever >> been released?) so it is much simpler to "fix" that breakage in pacemaker. > > It's not pacemaker, it's just a resource agent. Which makes it > much easier to fix, just by introducing one parameter which would > hold the remote node name. In this case some pacemaker internals are also involved. RA is just a stub with a "well-known" name. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
