On 26 Feb 17:25, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:49:35 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
On 26 Feb 13:47, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>-struct mlx5e_umr_wqe {
>+struct mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr {
> struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl;
> struct mlx5_wqe_umr_ctrl_seg uctrl;
> struct mlx5_mkey_seg mkc;
>+};
>+
>+struct mlx5e_umr_wqe {
>+ struct mlx5e_umr_wqe_hdr hdr;
You missed or ignored my comment on v0, anyway:
Can we have struct mlx5e_umr_wq_hdr defined anonymously within
mlx5e_umr_wqe? Let's avoid namespace pollution.
It's also used in struct mlx5e_rq, I don't think it can be anonymous?
Yep, I see now, Thanks!.
