On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:59:53PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 00:21, Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The UM builds distinguish i386 from x86_64 via SUBARCH, but we don't
> > support building i386 directly with Clang. To make SUBARCH work for
> > i386 UM, we need to explicitly test for it.
> >
> > This lets me run i386 KUnit tests with Clang:
> >
> > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
> >         --make_options LLVM=1 \
> >         --make_options SUBARCH=i386
> > ...
> >
> > Fixes: c7500c1b53bf ("um: Allow builds with Clang")
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> > ---
> 
> Thanks for this -- I'd been using `--kconfig_add CONFIG_64BIT=n` as a
> way to build i386 UML kernels, which seems to work even without this
> patch -- but this is definitely an improvement.

Thanks! Yeah, I figured there must have been a way to get at it. I
wanted to make it work the "normal" way.

> It may be worth noting that CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE is incompatible with
> clang + i386, which seems to affect UML as well. (That might actually
> not be required, as I think UML doesn't use any of the strange
> -mregparm calling convention stuff which appears to be what breaks
> FORTIFY_SOURCE here.)

Also fixed! :)
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

> Tested-by: David Gow <[email protected]>

Thanks for testing; I've updated the trailers in my tree.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Reply via email to