From: Zijun Hu <[email protected]>

strstarts() is frequently invoked to test if a string has another string
as prefix, but its performance is degraded by the strlen() loop contained.

Improve its performance by eliminating the strlen() loop.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/string.h | 10 +---------
 lib/string.c           | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/string.h b/include/linux/string.h
index 
01621ad0f598ccdfae819b1a5058607e79d8a751..e5f7defa277572719e1dbfdd264f3de6ef8544f1
 100644
--- a/include/linux/string.h
+++ b/include/linux/string.h
@@ -345,15 +345,7 @@ extern ssize_t memory_read_from_buffer(void *to, size_t 
count, loff_t *ppos,
 
 int ptr_to_hashval(const void *ptr, unsigned long *hashval_out);
 
-/**
- * strstarts - does @str start with @prefix?
- * @str: string to examine
- * @prefix: prefix to look for.
- */
-static inline bool strstarts(const char *str, const char *prefix)
-{
-       return strncmp(str, prefix, strlen(prefix)) == 0;
-}
+bool strstarts(const char *str, const char *prefix);
 
 size_t memweight(const void *ptr, size_t bytes);
 
diff --git a/lib/string.c b/lib/string.c
index 
eb4486ed40d259e43dfb63d76c2bd57ef74e2fd1..ea52c8509328358e436766b1186a82419d45089d
 100644
--- a/lib/string.c
+++ b/lib/string.c
@@ -285,6 +285,28 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(strcmp);
 #endif
 
+/**
+ * strstarts - does @str start with @prefix?
+ * @str: string to examine
+ * @prefix: prefix to look for.
+ */
+bool strstarts(const char *str, const char *prefix)
+{
+       unsigned char c1, c2;
+
+       do {
+               c1 = *str++;
+               c2 = *prefix++;
+
+               if (c1 != c2)
+                       return c2 == '\0';
+
+       } while (c2 != '\0');
+
+       return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(strstarts);
+
 #ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCMP
 /**
  * strncmp - Compare two length-limited strings

-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to