On 18. Aug 2025, at 20:26, Justin Stitt wrote: > Looks good. > > Here's my checklist: > 1) strcpy() and strscpy() have differing return values, but we aren't using > it. > 2) strscpy() can fail with -E2BIG if source is too big, but it isn't in > this case. > 3) two-arg version of strscpy() is OK to use here as the source has a known > size at compile time. > > Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <[email protected]>
Thanks for your thorough review. Thorsten
