On Tue 2025-07-08 16:48:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2025, at 16:24, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Wed 2025-07-02 13:28:35, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the nice report.
> >
> > The problem is how cpumask_var_t is defined in
> > include/linux/cpumask_types.h:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
> > typedef struct cpumask *cpumask_var_t;
> > #else
> > typedef struct cpumask cpumask_var_t[1];
> > #endif /* CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK */
> >
> > And KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER() expect that the 3rd parameter
> > is a pointer.
> >
> > I am going to solve this by adding a wrapper over free_cpumask_var()
> > which would work with a pointer to cpumask_var_t.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with the cleanup mechanism of kunit,
> but can't you just move the mask allocation outside of
> test_readerwriter()?
>
> > + */
> > +static void prbtest_free_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask)
> > +{
> > + free_cpumask_var(*mask);
> > +}
>
> Or you could pass this as a cpumask_t pointer instead,
> which should do the right thing without the indirection.
It was actually enough to use this in the KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER()
definition. It removed the warning about passing an array type.
And I needed neither a wrapper not #ifdef.
I am going to send an updated version of the patch. I am sorry
that it took so long. This patch has fallen though cracks because
of vacation and other urgent tasks.
Best Regards,
Petr
