On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 02:16:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:30:43 -0800 Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 07:39:44PM +0000, Bill Wendling wrote:
> > > Add the '__counted_by_ptr' attribute to the 'regions' field of 'struct
> > > memblock_type'. The 'regions' field is an array of 'struct
> > > memblock_region' and its size is tracked by the 'max' field, which
> > > represents the total number of allocated regions.
> > 
> > As part of any counted_by annotation patch, there needs to be discussion
> > in the commit log about how it's been shown to be a safe annotation
> > to make. e.g. in this case, if all allocations of "regions" have a
> > corresponding "max" assignment, etc. If just "git grep" can't find them
> > all, using something like Coccinelle or CodeQL to search for struct
> > memblock_type::regions assignments can work.
> 
> How is anyone to know these things?  I can't find anything about this
> in include/ or Documentation/ or in the relevant commits.
> 
> There should be a comment at the __counted_by() definition site, please.
> 
> And possibly write a Documentation/ file then change checkpatch to
> direct people to that file if they add a counted_by?

This is a fair point, yes. The documentation and discussions around
counted_by are very big in my mind (and for Bill), so it was mostly a
consolidation/reminder and some extra detail on prior solutions, but
for anyone new to that annotation, we should have collected common
guidance. I will write something up.

-- 
Kees Cook

Reply via email to