On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:09:32PM +0800, Chen Ridong wrote: > Note that this level may already be used in existing BPF programs (e.g., > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_ls_uptr.c). Do we need to consider > compatibility here?
That's a good point. Is __counted_by instrumentation tied to some compiler flag? If so, might as well make it an optional extra field specifically for the annotation rather than changing the meaning of an existing field. Thanks. -- tejun
