On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 02:41:55PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 22:05 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
... > > 2) missing Return section (run kernel-doc validator with -Wreturn, > > for example). > > Good point. Should checkpatch.pl call kernel-doc (always or perhaps > if requested using command-line option)? > > OTOH 1) lib/cmdline.c violates kernel-doc -Wreturn almost everywhere > :-( and 2) IIUC this patch is already queued by Andrew. Andrew's workflow allows folding / squashing patches. > I would > prefer to fix kernel-doc glitches immediately after memvalue() and > its first real use case (presumably XFS) both reaches an upstream. Logically we should fix existing problems first and then do not add more (technical debt). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
