On 2026-01-16 10:53, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 1/16/26 7:53 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On 2026-01-13 10:04, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 1/12/26 9:13 PM, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
Redmi Note 8T (willow) is very similar to Redmi Note 8 (ginkgo)
the only difference is willow have NFC.
Make a common base from ginkgo devicetree for both device.
Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <[email protected]>
---
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
index 163ecdc7fd6c..70be19357d11 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
@@ -1,304 +1,12 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
/*
- * Copyright (c) 2025, Gabriel Gonzales <[email protected]>
+ * Copyright (c) 2026, Barnabas Czeman
Is there a reason for you to remove Gabriel's copyright from the 5
LoC
that remain in this file?
The original file was renamed to sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo-common.dtsi.
I have not removed it, it is a new file with the old file name but
i can add Gabriel's copyright here also, would that be fine?
Well you certainly don't seem to have contributed anything additionally
in this specific patch, other than splitting a source file into two
source files, so the rule of the land is to generally keep the
copyrights
as-is
I have kept the Copyright in the original file. The question is should I
add it here also?
Konrad
