On 15/01/2026 21:56, Kees Cook wrote: > A lot of SoC series end up getting CCed to the hardening list due to > their mention of "pstore" in device tree or similar, and this noise isn't > worth making sure I don't lose pstore patches by having them show up in > the hardening patchwork. ;) I can use better email filters instead! > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > --- > Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]> > Cc: Guilherme G. Piccoli <[email protected]> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index dc731d37c8fe..02c2cb7accb8 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -20961,7 +20961,6 @@ PSTORE FILESYSTEM > M: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > R: Tony Luck <[email protected]> > R: Guilherme G. Piccoli <[email protected]> > -L: [email protected] > S: Supported > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git > for-next/pstore > F: Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-blk.rst
Just want to explicitly thank you for that! Indeed, I think this might improve a lot the signal-to-noise of pstore patches =)
