On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 11:41:54AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 03:13:28PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> > This use PCS-CCS-CB-TCB Producer-Consumer Synchronization module, which
> > support append new DMA request during dmaengine runnings.
> >
> > Append new request during dmaengine runnings.
> >
> > But look like hardware have bug, which missed doorbell when engine is
> > running. So add workaround to push doorbelll again when found engine stop.
> >
> > Get more than 10% performance gain.
> >
> > The before
> >   Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=33.4k, BW=130MiB/s (137MB/s)
> >
> > After
> >   Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=38.8k, BW=151MiB/s (159MB/s)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Hello Frank,
>
> First of all, I hope that your:
> [PATCH v3 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor 
> preparation
> series will make it to the upcoming 6.20/7.0 merge window.
>
>
> This RFT series however breaks pci-epf-test:
>
> Before:
> #  RUN           pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST ...
> #            OK  pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST
> ok 14 pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST
> #  RUN           pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST ...
> #            OK  pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST
> ok 15 pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST
>
> After:
> #  RUN           pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST ...
> # READ_TEST: Test terminated by timeout
> #          FAIL  pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST
> not ok 14 pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.READ_TEST
> #  RUN           pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST ...
> # WRITE_TEST: Test terminated by timeout
> #          FAIL  pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST
> not ok 15 pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.WRITE_TEST
>
>
> After a bisect, first bad commit:
> commit 352fd8d5ed468ea616eb4974b5ac19203528b207
> Author: Frank Li <[email protected]>
> Date:   Fri Jan 9 15:13:28 2026 -0500
>
>     dmaengine: dw-edma: Dynamitc append new request during dmaengine running
>

Thanks, let me try to fix it.

Frank

>
>
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Reply via email to