Linux-Hardware Digest #891, Volume #13 Tue, 14 Nov 00 15:13:06 EST
Contents:
Re: Netgear FA410TX problems (bgeer)
RH 6.0 - 7.0 install problems on gateway 5400 (Todd Raeker)
Re: Plug and Play Linux (Edward Westin)
Votex2 driver code? (Kurt Ramsden)
Re: Linksys Networks everywhere NC100 ver 2.1 NIC (Xeno Campanoli)
Re: Linux dies with new Athlon ("Jim Bonadeo")
Linux: 440BX Chipset or i815? (Edward Westin)
How to set the Motherboard to the Chip/Jumper (Edward Westin)
440BX or i815 for Linux? (Edward Westin)
Re: RH 6.0 - 7.0 install problems on gateway 5400 (Joseph Heled)
Problem with Motorola softmodem (Alexander Tzancov)
Re: ALSA sound for Intel8x0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: LinkSys betrayed us! Poor prospects for Linux. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
zip drive - large file problem ("dv")
Need help: ASUS P/I-P55SP3AV + Redhat = slow (Bengt)
Re: Linux and ATA 100 chipset: can't boot when using both channel... ("Tobias Koch")
Fdisk error: no partition table (Peter Bismuti)
Re: 440BX or i815 for Linux? (Johan Kullstam)
HP Officejet G55 printer ("Jesper K. Pedersen")
Re: HP Officejet G55 printer (Robert Kiesling)
Linux 2.4.0 kernel compilation on Asus CUSL2 (Intel 815E chipset) - Redhat ("Stephen
Gutknecht \(VW\)")
Support for SVideo Out? (Jochen Henneberg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bgeer)
Subject: Re: Netgear FA410TX problems
Date: 14 Nov 2000 09:30:24 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niklas Karlsson) writes:
>GAH! It just struck me... I had been under the impression that the cable
>I'm using, which came with the Netgear card, was a crossover cable. This
>is probably not the case, however, which would explain a lot of things. ;)
>DUH! I feel stupid now. :) Time to get myself a crossover cable, then.
RE crossover cable:
I recommend obtaining a RJ45 "extension" plug - female to female -
take it apart, cross pins 1 to 3 & 2 to 6, then reassemble it.
With a crossover plug you can use 2 *standard* network cables for a
peer-to-peer connection. Why bother? Well, you don't have a
non-standard cable to get confused with standard cables, & in general
you need 2 cables anyway so you choose: either 2 standards & a
crossover plug, or a crossover cable & a standard cable.
Which pin is pin 1? Here's something I saved that some [now] unknown
soul offered up:
Peer-To-Peer Ethernet 10baseT
1&2 and 3&6 are transmit and receive differential
pairs. (forgot which is which), but in order make a
crossed-over cable you need to wire:
pin 1 to pin 3
pin 2 to pin 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 <- pin numbers
___________________
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | || <- pins showing
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| | | | | | | | | ||
|| ||
|| ||
|| || <- click-tab on back
|| ||
|| ||
\\ | | //
\\____| |____//
\____| |____/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
--
<> Robert Geer & Donna Tomky | |||| |||| <>
<> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | == == Suddenly, == == <>
<> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | == == We feel enchanted! == == <>
<> Albuquerque, NM USA | |||| |||| <>
------------------------------
From: Todd Raeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: RH 6.0 - 7.0 install problems on gateway 5400
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:34:20 -0500
I am trying to install RH 6.0 and 7.0 on a dual processor Gateway 5400.
I boot from the install floppy and all goes well until probing the
PCI bus at which the system freezes and is completely unresponsive. It
has an adaptec 29160N SCSI card for drives but removing the card and
harddrives has the same result so its not any card PCI card hanging.
I have been successful with dual processor boxes from Gateway but this
new machine has a newer bios with a stupid GUI. I suspect the bios is
the problem. Anybody have similar experiences, fixes or advice?
Thanks.
Todd.
------------------------------
From: Edward Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Plug and Play Linux
Date: 14 Nov 2000 10:01:24 -0800
Frank,
In line with your statement I am considering the Asus CUBX-E
which looks quite suited for linux (and windows if need be). It is
based on the 440BX chipset which seems to be considered more stable by
some in the linux community. I am wondering though if the i815
motherboards would not be a better choice. Thank you for your
comments.
Best Regards,
Ed
Frank Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Edward Westin wrote:
> >
> > Xavier, Nobody answered but finally you were kind enough to do so.
> > This was exactly the type of help I needed and I am very impressed at
> > the price of your setup. Thank you very much. Perhaps others will
> > contribute as I am sure this is of interest to many of us. Everyone
> > gets behind what is happening in hardware if they take their eye off
> > the ball for even one month. Today I was talking to a guy who was
> > trying to make the point that he liked to go with the cheapest 440bx
> > board he could find and the cheapest sound and video cards that work.
> > He said that you would be surprised at how well these cheap components
> > performed these days. He like a good case because he said that is the
> > one thing that will last; everything else he liked to replace
> > periodically. Well, I don't know, but I've seen several people who
> > don't like to go with expensive components. I don't know that
> > cheapest is necessarily the way to go but $75 for your video card
> > sounds like a kind of sweet spot to me. I was thinking about an Asus
> > CUBX-E board but after talking to this guy, I'm beginning to
> > appreciate his way of thinking. Not that the Asus board is
> > particularly expensive but is it necessary? I don't know. I don't want
> > to sound cheap or anything but does linux (or I) really require much.
> > I'm beginning to appreciate what a great art it is to assemble
> > hardware, and if one has the knowledge, combining that hardware with
> > Linux can be true alchemy. :-)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ed Westin
> > > is similar to what I > describe above? Thank you for any help.
>
> I agree to a point. However, in my experience, motherboards cause more
> problems than any other single component. I have one of my systems and
> my Grand daughter's system setting here with Motherboard problems.
>
> Frank
------------------------------
From: Kurt Ramsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Votex2 driver code?
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:24:01 -0700
Hello All,
Does anyone no were I can get the code for a Vortex2 PCI sound
card? With Aureal folding it's hard to find anything. I wish
they would have left thier driver page up.
Thanks!
Kurt
------------------------------
From: Xeno Campanoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linksys Networks everywhere NC100 ver 2.1 NIC
Date: 14 Nov 2000 09:02:30 -0800
Gary P. Fiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Any one tried the Networks Everywhere NC100 ver 2.1 NIC 10/100 PCI
: card yet under Linux.?
I haven't been able to get the LinkSys NICs I got from CompUSA to work, and
I got feedback from others that they are not in good favor right now for use
with Linux. This may be why they're on sale. CompUSA may be wanting to unload
useless merchandise. If you end up having good luck with any please post
descriptions. The one I have is a LNE100TX, and it came with Linux software,
and it never really worked with 2.2.16, and failed to even be recognized by
2.2.17. I'd really like to use these if there's a reasonable trick to them.
Sincerely, Xeno
: The local CompUSA has them on sale. Have not found anything doing a
: web search about linux and this card. The Networks Everywhere does not
: mention Linux although they do under a kit using two cards and a hub.
: Gary Fiber
--
Xeno Campanoli (erstwhile Xeno Whitenack, and Rick Burgess)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Web pages: http://www.aa.net/~xeno)
------------------------------
From: "Jim Bonadeo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux dies with new Athlon
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:12:34 GMT
Tom,
Thanks for the response, and I understand your point. My decision to go
with a VIA chipset was based on my past experience. Previous to this I was
running a IWILL XA100 plus (VIA chipset) with a K6 - 450 and a (I can't
think of the name of the motherboard off the top of my head) with a Celeron
535, using a variety of different drives at one time or another (Quantum,
IBM, Maxtor.) I never experienced problems with any of these systems. I was
able to use optimization with both. (according to HDPARM I was able to boost
throughput from 3MB/Sec to 12 MB/Sec with my IWILL board and with my current
ABITS optimization has boosted my throughput from 5 MB to about 30MB/Sec, a
healthy increase) of these setups.
I have experienced one thing that is unique with my current system. On
bootup, the system reports the cly/head/sector count that is set in the
bios, linux says this is wrong and says it will ignore it. If you view the
drive specs in /proc it reports the physical and logical parameters of the
drive. The logical numbers match what is in the BIOS.
Is it possible that this the method of drive access, (LBA,CHS,LARGE) could
have something to do with my problem. I am certain that this is a drive
access problem, since I have seen it lock up on heavy drive (write) access
and have seen the results of FSCK when I reboot. I am just not ready to
admit that it is a VIA problem and not a chipset/drive mismatch problem.
Since I am a Quantum fan, I have not loyalty to WD. I could easily take the
drive back and get a different manufacture.
Jim
------------------------------
From: Edward Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux: 440BX Chipset or i815?
Date: 14 Nov 2000 10:13:54 -0800
Which is the better choice in motherboards the 440bx chipset or the
i815 (for linux)? I am under the impression theat the 440bx is the
wiser choice because it is said to be more stable. Is this assumption
valid? Thank you.
------------------------------
From: Edward Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to set the Motherboard to the Chip/Jumper
Date: 14 Nov 2000 10:22:31 -0800
I am considering placing a 700Mhz Celeron on an Asus CUBX mb, but the
manual does not list the new 700Mhz jumper settings (Only goes up to
550). This mb (CUBX-E) only came out two months ago so I imagine it
supports the Celerons at that speed. How does one set this properly?
Or is it some kind of autodetect?
------------------------------
From: Edward Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 440BX or i815 for Linux?
Date: 14 Nov 2000 10:24:02 -0800
Which is the better choice in motherboards the 440bx chipset or the
i815 (for linux)? I am under the impression theat the 440bx is the
wiser choice because it is said to be more stable. Is this assumption
valid? Thank you.
------------------------------
From: Joseph Heled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: RH 6.0 - 7.0 install problems on gateway 5400
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:37:33 -0800
Todd Raeker wrote:
>
> I am trying to install RH 6.0 and 7.0 on a dual processor Gateway 5400.
> I boot from the install floppy and all goes well until probing the
> PCI bus at which the system freezes and is completely unresponsive. It
> has an adaptec 29160N SCSI card for drives but removing the card and
> harddrives has the same result so its not any card PCI card hanging.
> I have been successful with dual processor boxes from Gateway but this
> new machine has a newer bios with a stupid GUI. I suspect the bios is
> the problem. Anybody have similar experiences, fixes or advice?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Todd.
I had a GateWay 5300 freeze with both RH 6.2 and SuSE during installation. The
support teams for both are disappointing, to say the least. My machine has a
touchpad, and probably yours too. After many frustrating hours I found that
disabling *the mouse* from the bios menu helped. After the installation, turn it
back on. (I found that only yesterday, so I can't be certain everything works
yet ...)
-Joseph
------------------------------
From: Alexander Tzancov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with Motorola softmodem
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 21:16:13 +0200
Hello!
I have a Motorola SM56 PCI sofmodem and can't use it under Linux.
I'll be very appreciated if anyone drop me a line with some help about
it.
Thank you in advance.
Alexander Tzancov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ALSA sound for Intel8x0
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:29:14 GMT
Could anyone perhaps offer me some help with this chipset? (Intel 810)
I can't it working at all. Won't even compile correctly. Here's the
exact messages displayed when I try 'make install':
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/alsa-driver-0.5.9d/kernel'
gcc -DALSA_BUILD -D__KERNEL__ -O2 -DLINUX -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -I/usr/include -I.. -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c
sound.c
In file included from ../include/driver.h:66,
from sound.c:23:
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:1:2: #error Modules should never use
kernel-headers system headers,
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h:2:2: #error but headers from an
appropriate kernel-source
In file included from sound.c:23:
../include/driver.h:481:39: warning: nothing can be pasted after this
token
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:8: Warning: Ignoring changed section attributes for
.modinfo
make[1]: *** [sound.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/alsa-driver-0.5.9d/kernel'
make: *** [compile] Error 1
Any help at all offered is appriciated greatly. Please contact me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
Paul Sauvola
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Ketil Klepsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I just installed the ALSA drivers. Following the instructions to the
> letter. (Including the lines to be added in conf.modules). Everything
> works perfect apart from my mp3s playing at about 120% speed at all
> times (smurf muzak ain't that cool).
>
> I have a Intel i815 myself. Before I tried the ALSA i also got
> 4fronts OSS working fine too (Exept they cost money of course).
>
> My conf.modules (the sound part):
>
> # ALSA portion
> alias char-major-116 snd
> # OSS/Free portion
> alias char-major-14 soundcore
> alias snd-card-0 snd-card-intel8x0
> alias sound-slot-0 snd-card-0
> # OSS/Free portion - card #1
> alias sound-service-0-0 snd-mixer-oss
> alias sound-service-0-1 snd-seq-oss
> alias sound-service-0-3 snd-pcm-oss
> alias sound-service-0-8 snd-seq-oss
> alias sound-service-0-12 snd-pcm-oss
>
> Setting xmms to use OSS afterwards gave me all the music i needed
> (with all the excess speed I did NOT need) =)
>
> Hope ye got something outta that
> K.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LinkSys betrayed us! Poor prospects for Linux.
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:42:56 GMT
In comp.os.linux.hardware Russell Petree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Yea, I found it very annoying that they didn't provide better support. Heck
: they didn't even host
: the driver on their website, but it is a very good 10/100 card for under $15...
Indeed, which was the reason I got it ...
I don't understand why we still have so many threads on this
subject. When I got mine, there actually hadn't really been that many
threads, so thigns like deja were coming up empty - but now this revision
of the card has been out for a while. Doesn't anyone do a bit of research
before running to the newsgroups and bitching about their problems? :)
--
Jeff Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"You're one of those condescending UNIX users! ...."
"Here's a nickel kid ... get yourself a real computer."
------------------------------
From: "dv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: zip drive - large file problem
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:02:12 GMT
Having a problem with zip drive and a large file of about 44 MB. Using
redhat 5.1, linux 2.0.35 (gcc version 2.7.2.3). formatted zip disk for
native linux.
When initially saving the file to the zip disk, the only way I could get it
to copy (cp -ar) without error was to copy it alone without any other files.
then about 80% of the time it would copy without error messages. if i tried
to copy the file with others it gave errors 100% of the time.
now when I have tried to transfer the file back to a hard drive from the zip
disk it always gives errors even when done by itself.
error message received (same message whether copying to or from zip disk):
ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc=28, key=4, asc=47, ascq=0
end_request: I/O error, dev 16:41, sector 41224
(about 5-6 similar errors)
after the copy back to harddrive the file did 'cat' fine.
all other files (next largest being 4 MB) transfer fine either direction
even if total MB of the files moved as a group exceeds the 44MB.
any help to solve this (or at least suggest a method to break up a large
file into smaller chunks to transfer and then allow recombining) would be
appreciated.
Paul
------------------------------
From: Bengt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need help: ASUS P/I-P55SP3AV + Redhat = slow
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:05:01 +0100
Hi all
I've just installed the latest Redhat on an ASUS P/I-P55SP3AV.
It has a 133 MHz Pentium, a SiS6205 Share Memory VGA Driver, and 16+128M
RAM. (Minus 1 or 2 for the video.)
I have set up a few partitions (4 or 5) as 128M swap each.
After playing with lilo the system can see all memory.
Problem:
Gnome runs extreemly s l o w.
E.g: If I select something in a menu, it can take many seconds just for
the focus to traverse to the correct menu item.
Function ok but no performance at all.
Hints anyone?
/Bengt
ps:
I'm new to Linux but I used the same computer with NT4 for a long time.
That worked quite ok.
------------------------------
From: "Tobias Koch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and ATA 100 chipset: can't boot when using both channel...
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:05:11 +0100
Hey !
Try passing kernel parameters at "linux:" boot prompt
for ex.: mykernel ide2=base,controlreg,irq ide3=...
There's a doc on the net on how to determine the <base>, <controlreg>,... it
should be in any Distribution's Docu/howto, as well.
regards,
Toby
"shane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 22:46:06 -0500, "Levoz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >yes these are enabled...
> >Levoz
> >
> >"James Richard Tyrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Levoz wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > The title says it all... I want to know why linux freezes when I use
> >both
> >> > channel of my onboard Promise ATA 100 chipset. I tried kernel 2.2.17
> >with
> >> > patch and kernel 2.4.0test9, but everytime I boot with devices on the
> >> > secondary ATA100 channel, when the kernel is looking for the IRQ of
the
> >> > second channel, it freezes hard. Have to reboot. I don't get why... I
> >> > thought the driver was suppose to support this contraint: two
channels
> >and
> >> > one IRQ.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway, any help would be appreciated...
> >> > Levoz
> >>
> >> When you configured your Kernel (I use menuconfig) did you enable:
> >>
> >> Generic PCI IDE chipset support
> >>
> >> You can then enable:
> >>
> >> Sharing PCI IDE interrupts support
> >> Generic PCI bus-master DMA support
> >> Use DMA by default when available
> >>
> >> If you have already built the Kernel with these r options enabled, I
don't
> >> have any other ideas.
> >>
> >> JRT
>
> I'm seeing similar behavior, but my Promise ATA100 isn't built into
> the motherboard, it's a PCI card.
>
> My system is a redhat7,2.2.17 w/ ide patches. The kernel is built
> similarly to the above.
>
> The pc was running fine with one drive off the promise channel1, with
> a normal ide cable.
>
> I bought another drive, a Maxtor 80gb, and two udma/66 18" cables -
> one cable for the new drive, one to replace the original normal ide
> cable.
>
> And I'm seeing flakyness galore. Mostly ext2fs errors when the new,
> 2nd drive (on the promise 2nd channel as master) has 500mb or more
> data written to it.
>
> If I unmount that 2nd drive, and run e2fsck on it, it'll lock the
> machine.
>
> Upon rebooting, in init1 mode, e2fsck'ing the drives off the promise,
> will lock the machine.
>
> The *only* thing that seems to stop the errors and lockups it to
>
> a) remove the 2nd, new drive
> b) remove the 2nd new drive and switch the first drive to the plain
> old ide cable.
>
> The machine is still fsck'ing the rest of the drives. After I get them
> all cleaned up (or if) I'm going to play some cable swap games with
> the udma/66 cables and plain ide cable on the first/second hard drive
> and see if if the card and drives do not give me problems when there
> are no udma/66 cables involved.
>
> I'm posting this, and emailing both of you because the thread in
> comp.os.linux.hardware is from a week ago. Sorry if it annoys you.
> Please reply or post back if you have any thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Shane
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Bismuti)
Subject: Fdisk error: no partition table
Date: 14 Nov 2000 19:09:55 GMT
I'm trying to put in a new HD and can't get it to work. I've tried using
the floppy that came with it ( Maxtor ) and I've tried using a Win98 setup
floppy & cd, and I've gried Redhat and none work.
In REdhat 6.1, I get the following error:
An error occured reading the partition table for the block
device hda. The error was: No such file or directory
Can this be fixed? Does this mean that the drive is no good?
Thanks
------------------------------
Subject: Re: 440BX or i815 for Linux?
From: Johan Kullstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Nov 2000 14:16:42 -0500
Edward Westin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which is the better choice in motherboards the 440bx chipset or the
> i815 (for linux)? I am under the impression theat the 440bx is the
> wiser choice because it is said to be more stable. Is this assumption
> valid? Thank you.
both are reasonable.
the 440BX is limited to 100MHz FSB (unless you overclock it -- which
isn't a bad option). i am not sure if BX boards with socket-1 are
available. slot-1 is nearly dead. while BX is a good chipset,
upgrading with it is going to be limited.
the i815 will do 133MHz FSB and newer AGP and IDE modes. on the other
hand, it doesn't have as long a track record as the BX. i haven't
heard many bad things about it. slot-1 will allow for a little more
upgradability than socket-1.
you might want to look at the VIA apollo pro chipset too.
also AMD's athlon and duron offerenings are certainly price/
performance competitive. if you go athlon, make sure you get a
socket-a model.
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
sysengr
------------------------------
From: "Jesper K. Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: HP Officejet G55 printer
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 20:29:53 +0100
Having gotten a HP Officejet G55 printer and a nice little computer through
my work I find that there is no generel driver for this printer.
I did manage getting the scanner function up and running - but still miss
the printing function. Anyone with any ideas of what printer driver works
best with this printer?
Thank you for your assistance
Jesper K. Pedersen
SolNet Data Service
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: HP Officejet G55 printer
From: Robert Kiesling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 19:45:55 GMT
"Jesper K. Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having gotten a HP Officejet G55 printer and a nice little computer through
> my work I find that there is no generel driver for this printer.
> I did manage getting the scanner function up and running - but still miss
> the printing function. Anyone with any ideas of what printer driver works
> best with this printer?
That depends on your options, wrt/the application. If trying to print
Postscript using ghostscript as a print filter under APS or
MagicFilter, then probably most (all) of the LaserJet drivers will
work, some with more options than others. If using StarOffice and the
like, start with the HPL non-Postscript drivers, and see which one
works better.
--
Robert Kiesling
Linux FAQ Maintainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mainmatter.com/linux-faq/toc.html http://www.mainmatter.com/
------------------------------
From: "Stephen Gutknecht \(VW\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux 2.4.0 kernel compilation on Asus CUSL2 (Intel 815E chipset) - Redhat
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:59:29 -0800
Hi.
I'm still looking to share info with other CUSL2 users on Linux compilation.
I'm on Redhat 7.0.
Here is how I am currently doing builds:
http://www.roundsparrow.com/Linux/240oni815/
Not yet working, but I'm close :)
Please email me or post here so we can compare notes!
Stephen Gutknecht
Renton, Washington
------------------------------
From: Jochen Henneberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Support for SVideo Out?
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:59:43 +0100
Hi,
I've an Elsa Erazor X2 graphic card and it works fine so far, what I
want is to know if someone has experience with the SVideo Out
support under Linux! Does it bring my monitor picture on TV or
how does it work or cant it be enabled with Linux?
Thanks,
Jochen
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
