On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:32:06AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:16:13PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > Support setting the reference voltage from the device tree.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwmon/mcp3021.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/mcp3021.c b/drivers/hwmon/mcp3021.c
> > index 972444a..81f4b7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/mcp3021.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/mcp3021.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >   * Copyright (C) 2008-2009, 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> >   * Author: Mingkai Hu <[email protected]>
> >   * Reworked by Sven Schuchmann <[email protected]>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Clemens Gruber <[email protected]>
> 
> Sorry, I can't accept that for such a minor change. Feel free to add
> something like "devicetree support added by ...", if you like.

I understand, no problem. I'll use your suggestion then.

> 
> >   *
> >   * This driver export the value of analog input voltage to sysfs, the
> >   * voltage unit is mV. Through the sysfs interface, lm-sensors tool
> > @@ -22,11 +23,13 @@
> >  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  
> > -/* Vdd info */
> > +/* Vdd / reference voltage in millivolt */
> >  #define MCP3021_VDD_MAX            5500
> >  #define MCP3021_VDD_MIN            2700
> > -#define MCP3021_VDD_REF            3300
> > +#define MCP3021_VDD_DEFAULT        3300
> 
> I don't really see the value of changing this, but if it makes you
> feel better at least make it MCP3021_VDD_REF_DEFAULT.

I changed it because all three defines are about the reference voltage,
not only the last one, which is just the default value.

Only changing the last one to MCP3021_VDD_REF_DEFAULT would not make it
less confusing.
Maybe replace MCP3021_VDD_ with MCP3021_VDD_REF_ for all three?

> 
> >  
> >  /* output format */
> >  #define MCP3021_SAR_SHIFT  2
> > @@ -47,7 +50,7 @@ enum chips {
> >   */
> >  struct mcp3021_data {
> >     struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > -   u32 vdd;        /* device power supply */
> > +   u32 vdd;        /* supply and reference voltage in millivolt */
> >     u16 sar_shift;
> >     u16 sar_mask;
> >     u8 output_res;
> > @@ -106,6 +109,7 @@ static int mcp3021_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  {
> >     int err;
> >     struct mcp3021_data *data = NULL;
> > +   struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
> >  
> >     if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
> >             return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -117,6 +121,21 @@ static int mcp3021_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  
> >     i2c_set_clientdata(client, data);
> >  
> > +   if (np) {
> > +           if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reference-voltage-microvolt",
> > +                                    &data->vdd))
> > +                   data->vdd = MCP3021_VDD_DEFAULT;
> > +           else
> > +                   data->vdd /= 1000;
> 
> It would be slightly better to reverse the logic here to make the code easier
> to read.
> 
>               if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "reference-voltage-microvolt",
>                                         &data->vdd))
>                       data->vdd /= 1000;
>               else
>                       data->vdd = MCP3021_VDD_DEFAULT;

Yes, I'll change it.

> 
> Not worth arguing about it, though, so feel free to keep it as is.
> 
> > +   } else {
> > +           u32 *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> > +
> > +           if (pdata)
> > +                   data->vdd = *pdata;
> > +           else
> > +                   data->vdd = MCP3021_VDD_DEFAULT;
> > +   }
> > +
> >     switch (id->driver_data) {
> >     case mcp3021:
> >             data->sar_shift = MCP3021_SAR_SHIFT;
> > @@ -129,15 +148,12 @@ static int mcp3021_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >             data->sar_mask = MCP3221_SAR_MASK;
> >             data->output_res = MCP3221_OUTPUT_RES;
> >             break;
> > +   default:
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> 
> Hmm ... that is really an unrelated change (nor is it really needed
> unless there is a bug in the code). Not worth arguing about it either,
> but please keep in mind that this is one of the things making life
> hard for maintainers.

I see, I'll remove it then.

Thank you for your feedback!

Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to