There is no reason to treat the IT8705F differently during device detection. If a single IT8705F chip indeed answers to both Super-IO addresses, we have code in place to detect the duplicate device address and skip the second one.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de> Cc: Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> --- drivers/hwmon/it87.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) --- linux-4.11.orig/drivers/hwmon/it87.c 2017-05-01 04:47:48.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-4.11/drivers/hwmon/it87.c 2017-05-04 11:17:49.868328706 +0200 @@ -3224,13 +3224,6 @@ static int __init sm_it87_init(void) goto exit_dev_unregister; found = true; - - /* - * IT8705F may respond on both SIO addresses. - * Stop probing after finding one. - */ - if (sio_data.type == it87) - break; } if (!found) { -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html