On Tue,  9 Oct 2018 11:26:02 -0700
Nicolin Chen <nicoleots...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Trace events are useful for people who collect data from the
> ftrace output. This patch adds initial trace events for the
> hwmon core. To call hwmon_attr_base() for aligned attr index
> numbers, this patch also moves the function upward.
> 
> Ftrace outputs:
>  ...: hwmon_attr_show_string: index=2, attr_name=in2_label, val=VDD_5V
>  ...: hwmon_attr_show: index=2, attr_name=in2_input, val=5112
>  ...: hwmon_attr_show: index=2, attr_name=curr2_input, val=440
> 
> Note that the _attr_show and _attr_store functions are tied
> to the _with_info API. So a hwmon driver requiring the trace
> events feature should use _with_info API to register a hwmon
> device.

Hmm, this doesn't really explain why these trace events are needed.
They look to be attached to sysfs reads. What's the purpose of tracing
these?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleots...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                  |  1 +
>  drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c        | 27 ++++++++++----
>  include/trace/events/hwmon.h | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/trace/events/hwmon.h
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1640b9faa75e..589b32405bf4 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -6461,6 +6461,7 @@ F:      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/
>  F:   Documentation/hwmon/
>  F:   drivers/hwmon/
>  F:   include/linux/hwmon*.h
> +F:   include/trace/events/hwmon*.h
>  
>  HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE
>  M:   Matt Mackall <m...@selenic.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c
> index ac1cdf88840f..975c95169884 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
>  
> +#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> +#include <trace/events/hwmon.h>
> +
>  #define HWMON_ID_PREFIX "hwmon"
>  #define HWMON_ID_FORMAT HWMON_ID_PREFIX "%d"
>  
> @@ -171,6 +174,13 @@ static int hwmon_thermal_add_sensor(struct device *dev,
>  }
>  #endif /* IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_THERMAL) && ... */
>  
> +static int hwmon_attr_base(enum hwmon_sensor_types type)
> +{
> +     if (type == hwmon_in)
> +             return 0;
> +     return 1;
> +}
> +
>  /* sysfs attribute management */
>  
>  static ssize_t hwmon_attr_show(struct device *dev,
> @@ -185,6 +195,9 @@ static ssize_t hwmon_attr_show(struct device *dev,
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     trace_hwmon_attr_show(hattr->index + hwmon_attr_base(hattr->type),
> +                           hattr->name, val);
> +
>       return sprintf(buf, "%ld\n", val);
>  }
>  
> @@ -193,6 +206,7 @@ static ssize_t hwmon_attr_show_string(struct device *dev,
>                                     char *buf)
>  {
>       struct hwmon_device_attribute *hattr = to_hwmon_attr(devattr);
> +     enum hwmon_sensor_types type = hattr->type;
>       const char *s;
>       int ret;
>  
> @@ -201,6 +215,9 @@ static ssize_t hwmon_attr_show_string(struct device *dev,
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     trace_hwmon_attr_show_string(hattr->index + hwmon_attr_base(type),

Also, the other to tracepoints use hattr->type, here you create a
separate variable. Is that just to keep within the 80 char limit?

-- Steve

> +                                  hattr->name, s);
> +
>       return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", s);
>  }
>  
> @@ -221,16 +238,12 @@ static ssize_t hwmon_attr_store(struct device *dev,
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return ret;
>  
> +     trace_hwmon_attr_store(hattr->index + hwmon_attr_base(hattr->type),
> +                            hattr->name, val);
> +
>       return count;
>  }
>  
> -static int hwmon_attr_base(enum hwmon_sensor_types type)
> -{
> -     if (type == hwmon_in)
> -             return 0;
> -     return 1;
> -}
> -
>  static bool is_string_attr(enum hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr)
>  {
>       return (type == hwmon_temp && attr == hwmon_temp_label) ||

Reply via email to