> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 8:19 PM
> To: Erni Sri Satya Vennela <[email protected]>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Dexuan Cui
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Long Li <[email protected]>;
> Konstantin Taranov <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Paul Rosswurm
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net: mana: Add sched HTB offload
> support
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:48:30 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 05:03:49PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 23:33:39 -0700 Erni Sri Satya Vennela wrote:
> > > > This controller can offload only one HTB leaf.
> > >
> > We selected tc-htb for our current use case because we plan to support
> > multiple speed classes in the future.
>
> Which net-shapers also support.
Thanks for pointing that out...
But for easier usage with existing tc tool for customers, can we still
use tc-htb offload? Does using tc-htb offload for speed clamping break
any coding convention or API specs?
Thanks,
- Haiyang
