On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 08:55:25PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> s/a helper/helper/ in the subject.

Ugh! I missed this since v3. I corrected it. Thanks for noticing.

> 
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 5:35 AM Ricardo Neri
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > In preparation to move the functionality to wake secondary CPUs up out of
> > the ACPI code, add two helper functions.
> >
> > The function acpi_setup_mp_wakeup_mailbox() stores the physical address of
> > the mailbox and updates the wakeup_secondary_cpu_64() APIC callback.
> >
> > There is a slight change in behavior: now the APIC callback is updated
> > before configuring CPU hotplug offline behavior. This is fine as the APIC
> > callback continues to be updated unconditionally, regardless of the
> > restriction on CPU offlining.
> >
> > The function acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup_mailbox() returns a pointer to the
> > mailbox. Use this helper function only in the portions of the code for
> > which the variable acpi_mp_wake_mailbox will be out of scope once it is
> > relocated out of the ACPI directory.
> >
> > The wakeup mailbox is only supported for CONFIG_X86_64 and needed only with
> > CONFIG_SMP=y.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]>
> 
> With the above nit addressed
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Thank you!

Reply via email to