On Tue, Jul 15 2025 at 12:09, Nuno Das Neves wrote: > On 7/9/2025 4:40 PM, Wei Liu wrote: >> CC Nuno who is also touching on this file. >> >> Nam, thanks for this patch. >> >> Nuno's patches fix a few bugs with the current implementation. I expect >> those patches to have contextual conflicts with this patch. I would like >> to commit Nuno's patches first since those are bug fixes, and then >> circle back to this one. >> >> Nuno, can you please review this patch? >> > > I don't think I can give a Reviewed-by since I don't have the context > for these changes.
The cover letter provides the information along with a link for deeper information: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] > It doesn't look like this conflicts with the changes in my patches. It might not look like it, but reality tells a different story: Applying patch _PATCH_v2_2_2_x86_hyperv_Switch_to_msi_create_parent_irq_domain_.patch patching file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 10. Hunk #2 FAILED at 276. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c patching file drivers/hv/Kconfig Hunk #1 FAILED at 10. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file drivers/hv/Kconfig Nam, can you please redo the patch against the hyperv tree? Thanks, tglx
