> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 8:02 PM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]>; KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH net, 1/2] net: core: Fix missing init of
> llist_node in setup_net()
> 
> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 4:51 PM Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Haiyang Zhang <[email protected]>
> >
> > Add init_llist_node for lock-less list nodes in struct net in
> > setup_net(), so we can test if a node is on a list or not.
> >
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Fixes: d6b3358a2813 ("llist: add interface to check if a node is on a
> list.")
> 
> No Fixes tag is needed because we didn't have a need to
> test if net is queued for destruction.

I know the original patch wasn't buggy.
This tag is just for the stable backport version hint.

In another thread, Eric Dumazet recommended Fixes tag for patches for "stable":
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/[email protected]/

Thanks,
- Haiyang

Reply via email to