On 10/2/2025 3:37 PM, Stanislav Kinsburskii wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 10:13:46PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >> Use the -ETIMEDOUT errno value as the correct 1:1 match for the >> hypervisor timeout status >> > > The commit message should answer the question why this change is being > made. > Is there a practical reason for this or is it only for consistensy? > <snip>
It's for consistency and because it's a better match. See my sibling response for other error codes that I can also fix in a v2. Thanks, Easwar (he/him)
