…>> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_crash.c >> @@ -464,9 +464,7 @@ static int hv_crash_setup_trampdata(u64 trampoline_va) >> return -1; >> } >> - dest = (void *)trampoline_va; >> - memcpy(dest, &hv_crash_asm32, size); >> - >> + dest = memcpy((void *)trampoline_va, &hv_crash_asm32, size); >> dest += size; >> dest = (void *)round_up((ulong)dest, 16); >> tramp = (struct hv_crash_tramp_data *)dest; > > > I tried running spatch Coccinelle checks on this file, but could not get it > to flag this improvement.
The proposed source code transformation is not supported by a coccicheck script so far. > Do you mind sharing more details on the issue reproduction please. Would you like to take another look at corresponding development discussions? Example: [RFC] Increasing usage of direct pointer assignments from memcpy() calls with SmPL? https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/[email protected]/ https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2025-10/msg00049.html > I am OK with this change, Thanks for a bit of positive feedback. > though it may cost code readability a little bit. Would you complain about other variable assignments in such a direction? Regards, Markus
