On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 06:12:35 -0700 Aditya Garg wrote:
> @@ -289,6 +290,21 @@ netdev_tx_t mana_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> net_device *ndev)
>       cq = &apc->tx_qp[txq_idx].tx_cq;
>       tx_stats = &txq->stats;
>  
> +     if (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 > MAX_TX_WQE_SGL_ENTRIES &&
> +         skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 2 > MAX_TX_WQE_SGL_ENTRIES) {
> +             /* GSO skb with Hardware SGE limit exceeded is not expected here
> +              * as they are handled in mana_features_check() callback
> +              */
> +             if (skb_is_gso(skb))
> +                     netdev_warn_once(ndev, "GSO enabled skb exceeds max SGE 
> limit\n");

This could be the same question Simon asked but why do you think you
need this line? Sure you need to linearize non-GSO but why do you care
to warn specifically about GSO?! Looks like defensive programming or
testing leftover..

> +             if (skb_linearize(skb)) {
> +                     netdev_warn_once(ndev, "Failed to linearize skb with 
> nr_frags=%d and is_gso=%d\n",
> +                                      skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags,
> +                                      skb_is_gso(skb));

.. in practice including is_gso() here as you do is probably enough for
debug

> +                     goto tx_drop_count;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       pkg.tx_oob.s_oob.vcq_num = cq->gdma_id;
>       pkg.tx_oob.s_oob.vsq_frame = txq->vsq_frame;
>  
> @@ -402,8 +418,6 @@ netdev_tx_t mana_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> net_device *ndev)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     WARN_ON_ONCE(pkg.wqe_req.num_sge > MAX_TX_WQE_SGL_ENTRIES);
> -
>       if (pkg.wqe_req.num_sge <= ARRAY_SIZE(pkg.sgl_array)) {
>               pkg.wqe_req.sgl = pkg.sgl_array;
>       } else {
> @@ -438,9 +452,13 @@ netdev_tx_t mana_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> net_device *ndev)
>  
>       if (err) {
>               (void)skb_dequeue_tail(&txq->pending_skbs);
> +             mana_unmap_skb(skb, apc);
>               netdev_warn(ndev, "Failed to post TX OOB: %d\n", err);

You have a print right here and in the callee. This condition must
(almost) never happen in practice. It's likely fine to just drop
the packet.

Either way -- this should be a separate patch.

> -             err = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> -             goto tx_busy;
> +             if (err == -ENOSPC) {
> +                     err = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> +                     goto tx_busy;
> +             }
> +             goto free_sgl_ptr;
>       }
>  
>       err = NETDEV_TX_OK;
> @@ -478,6 +496,25 @@ netdev_tx_t mana_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> net_device *ndev)
>       return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>  }
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Reply via email to