Now that we pass the i2c_adapter as the first parameter, it makes little sense to pass its name separately as the second.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> --- Alex, I think it would make sense to merge this into your own patch? drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.39-rc3.orig/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c 2011-04-15 10:47:39.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.39-rc3/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-bit.c 2011-04-15 11:05:09.000000000 +0200 @@ -232,9 +232,10 @@ static int i2c_inb(struct i2c_adapter *i * Sanity check for the adapter hardware - check the reaction of * the bus lines only if it seems to be idle. */ -static int test_bus(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap, char *name) +static int test_bus(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap) { struct i2c_algo_bit_data *adap = i2c_adap->algo_data; + const char *name = i2c_adap->name; int scl, sda, ret; if (adap->pre_xfer) { @@ -622,7 +623,7 @@ static int __i2c_bit_add_bus(struct i2c_ int ret; if (bit_test) { - ret = test_bus(adap, adap->name); + ret = test_bus(adap); if (ret < 0) return -ENODEV; } -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
