On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:49:50AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:10:16AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.z...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/clk.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/clk.h b/include/linux/clk.h
> > index 7213b52..63985f7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clk.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clk.h
> > @@ -107,6 +107,25 @@ static inline void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static inline int clk_prepare_enable(struct clk *clk)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare(clk);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = clk_enable(clk);
> > + if (ret)
> > + clk_unprepare(clk);
>
> As Baruch already pointed out this is hard to read. Also it contains a
> bug. When clk_prepare fails clk_unprepare is called afterwards.
>
> Hint: Kernel guys are not afraid of having multiple return statements
> in a function, instead they like it when something is handled early
> without having to read the rest of the function.
{
int ret;
ret = clk_prepare(clk);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = clk_enable(clk);
if (ret)
clk_unprepare(clk);
return ret;
Like above code? Thanks for review.
Richard
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
