On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:47:55PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:47:10PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > >> > + clk_register_clkdev(cko1, NULL, "0-000a"); > >> > >> This dev_id looks a little strange to me. I understand that's the > >> consequence of having sgtl5000 clock managed in ASoC machine driver > >> imx-sgtl5000. > >> > > Just realised it's not the case. But shouldn't the name look like > > "sgtl5000.0-000a"? > > Since this is common code, we should not hardcode the I2C bus as the > codec can be connected in a I2C bus different of 0.
No, it's not. It's a sabrelite specific lookup which is done in imx6q_sabrelite_init, while imx6q_cko1_setup needs a better naming, as what I already commented. In the end, this type of board specific clock lookup should really go into device tree. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
