On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > + else if (np)
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "stericsson,irq-base",
> > &ab8500->irq_base);
> > +
> > + if (ab8500->irq_base == 0) {
>
> Shouldn't this be (av8500->irq_base == NO_IRQ) now that we're tranisitioning
> to
> use 0 as NO_IRQ?
Since we're into bike-shedding already, why not make it :? :-)
if (!ab8500->irq_base)
I usually prefer this syntax for testing if something has been assigned,
while I use a comparison with 0 only when it is a meant as a numeric value
rather than meant as validity test.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
