> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:27:13PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 July 2012, Qiao Zhou wrote: >> > > > >On the other hand, I think it probably makes sense to drop the > > > >irq_base member in this struct and rely on irq domains to allocate > > > >them dynamically as mentioned before. > > > > Do you mean that both regmap_add_irq_chip and mfd_add_devices api > > > pass -1 as the irq_base, so that system can dynamically allocate the > > > irq_base for it? > > > regmap_add_irq_chip should pass -1, mfd_add_devices should pass 0. > > Mark can probably correct me if that's wrong. > > That's right. > Mark, thanks for the confirmation.
Best Regards Qiao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
