On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Yegor Yefremov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Datta, Shubhrajyoti >> <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Shubhrajyoti <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> Thank you for the patch and sorry for delay. I tried the patch, > > Thanks for the test. > >> but it doesn't help. I still get timeouts only. I fear it is really a >> hardware feature, > > I feel that could be unlikely. > >> that OMAPs i2c stops if address is not acknowledged. >> At least this is my understanding of the reference manual. >> >> Here is the output from dmesg: > > > Another request. Can you disable the NACK interrupt on the ignore and > enable back? > > Also let me know if you know of any of the panda or sdp peripherals > which could keep going on > NACK.
I don't know any :-( This is also a not very common hardware where you have to make such tricks. > patch below. As I understand it is a stand alone patch not based on the previous one? I have the same result - timeout. Yegor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
