On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:32:28PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote: > Instead of use platform_driver_probe, use module_platform_driver > To support deferred probing > Also subsys_initcall may too early to auto set pinctl > > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei....@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Baruch Siach <bar...@tkos.co.il>
This patch is tougher than it looks. You need it, because
subsys_initcall may be too early for pinctrl. Other people might be
depending on subsys_initcall to get I2C active before they want to
activate, say, PMICs. So, I fear regressions, since deferred probing
might not be available in the needed places to avoid these regressions.
I am all ears for a nice transition away from subsys_initcall, anyone?
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 14 ++------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 4c5fada..36ceebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops,
> dw_i2c_suspend, dw_i2c_resume);
> MODULE_ALIAS("platform:i2c_designware");
>
> static struct platform_driver dw_i2c_driver = {
> + .probe = dw_i2c_probe,
> .remove = dw_i2c_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "i2c_designware",
> @@ -245,18 +246,7 @@ static struct platform_driver dw_i2c_driver = {
> .pm = &dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops,
> },
> };
> -
> -static int __init dw_i2c_init_driver(void)
> -{
> - return platform_driver_probe(&dw_i2c_driver, dw_i2c_probe);
> -}
> -subsys_initcall(dw_i2c_init_driver);
> -
> -static void __exit dw_i2c_exit_driver(void)
> -{
> - platform_driver_unregister(&dw_i2c_driver);
> -}
> -module_exit(dw_i2c_exit_driver);
> +module_platform_driver(dw_i2c_driver);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Baruch Siach <bar...@tkos.co.il>");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Synopsys DesignWare I2C bus adapter");
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
