On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 04:27:37PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 04:31:19PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > Intel Baytrail I2C controllers can be enumerated from PCI as well as from
> > ACPI. In order to support this add the Baytrail PCI IDs to the driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Basically fine, one question:
> 
> > -   snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-designware-pci-%d",
> > -           adap->nr);
> > +
> > +   if (adap->nr < 0)
> > +           snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name), "i2c-designware-pci");
> > +   else
> > +           snprintf(adap->name, sizeof(adap->name),
> > +                    "i2c-designware-pci-%d", adap->nr);
> 
> Maybe we just drop the "-%d" suffix entirely?

I suggested that already when Benson (CC'd) sent his Haswell patch series.
His opinion was that it is useful in certain cases to know the bus number
(like grepping /proc/interrupts, IIRC).

For Baytrail we don't need it so if nobody objects, I'll just go ahead and
drop it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to