Hello, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:14:15AM +0000, fugang.d...@freescale.com wrote: > I am sorry to tell you I don't have the reproduced platform for the issue > since the > Issue was found at one platform of customer of freescale, and I debug the > issue with > Customer, at last generate the patch for customer platform, test fine. So I > want to Does the customer use the -rt patch?
> Submit the patch. In our platforms, it is not easy to reproduce the issue. I tend to not want the patch in mainline. IMHO a wrong workaround that fixes the issue only for 95% is worse than an unfixed driver. Maybe when analysing more exact the outcome is that the patch is right, but if there is a race condition somewhere in the code it might be that there is still a bug. Not being able to reproduce the problem doesn't necessarily imply that the introduced change is a real fix. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
