Hello,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:07:05PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > + iproc_i2c->msg = msg;
> > Can it happen that iproc_i2c->msg still holds an uncompleted message
> > here or is this serialized by the core? Wolfram? Either here something
>
> We have per-adapter locks serializing transfers, if you mean that?
ok, so in the efm32 driver the if (ddata->msgs) condition in
efm32_i2c_master_xfer can never be true, right?
> > > +static int bcm_iproc_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct bcm_iproc_i2c_dev *iproc_i2c = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +
> > > + i2c_del_adapter(&iproc_i2c->adapter);
> > You need to free the irq before i2c_del_adapter.
>
> One could also keep using devm_request_irq and disable all interrupts
> sources here?
calling devm_free_irq would work or writel(0, iproc_i2c->base +
IE_OFFSET) + synchronize_irq().
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
