Hi Jarkko,
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:32:07 +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Since pci_disable_device() is not called from i801_suspend() and power
> state is set already it means that subsequent pci_enable_device() calls do
> practically nothing but monotonically increase struct pci_dev enable_cnt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index b1d725d758bb..5fb35464f693 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static int i801_resume(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0);
> pci_restore_state(dev);
> - return pci_enable_device(dev);
> + return 0;
> }
> #else
> #define i801_suspend NULL
This looks reasonable but have you tested this change on a range of
actual laptops to make sure it has no unexpected side effect?
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
