On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:31:35AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > > > > After more discussion, brave users, and additional datasheet 
> > > > > evaluation,
> > > > > some API updates for the new I2C slave framework became imminent. The
> > > > > slave events now get some easier to understand naming. Also, the event
> > > > > handling has been simplified to only send one event per interrupt.
> > > > what is an interrupt here? An event where the bus driver needs feedback
> > > > from the backend?
> > > 
> > > More the other way around: when the bus driver needs to notify the
> > > backend. I wasn't 100% sure about the word 'interrupt', but then decided
> > > a HW slave support without interrupts would be so rare and adventurous
> > > that it is okay to use the term :)
> > Yeah, I agree on HW slave support without interrupts is hardly possible.
> > But I imagine that controllers differ in which situations they can issue
> > an interrupt so talking about them for generic code feels strange to me
> > because $flexiblecontrolerwithvariousirqs doesn't need to send more
> > events than $bareminimumcontroler.
> 
> Do you have a better word at hand? "...to send one event per event"? :)
Maybe:

        Also, the event handling has been simplified to only need a
        single call to the slave callback when an action by the backend
        is required.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to