> > IIRC it is the one which adds OF_POPULATED. If so, why is this not
> > scheduled for 4.1 as this bugfix depends on it?
> 
> No idea. This is an obvious bugfix.

Dunno if you did but mentioning after the commit message where you think
it should be applied is very helpful for maintainers.

> I would like to, yes. It’s just the nature of the process when dealing with
> multiple kernel trees. I would be happy for someone to pick up and queue it
> for 4.1.

That might be too late now... You could also have sent the patch to me
so that I could apply it via i2c with rob's ack. Next time...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to