On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:38:11AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>  static int xiic_bus_busy(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
> >> @@ -602,16 +601,21 @@ static void xiic_start_send(struct xiic_i2c *i2c)
> >>  static irqreturn_t xiic_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >>  {
> >>       struct xiic_i2c *i2c = dev_id;
> >> -
> >> -     spin_lock(&i2c->lock);
> >> +     u32 pend, isr, ier;
> >> +     irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> >> +     /* Do not processes a devices interrupts if the device has no
> >> +      * interrupts pending
> >> +      */
> >
> > Shouldn't you init 'ret' to IRQ_NONE then?
> >
> 
> Indeed I missed it.

Can you test this change on HW and report back?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to