On Thu Oct 22 00:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Dustin Byford
> <dus...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> > On Wed Oct 21 12:08, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >> I don't really have strong feelings whether it should be the I2C core or
> >> individual drivers setting the ACPI companion. However, it would be nice
> >> to match DT here and they assign their of_node per driver.
> >
> > OK with me, if we can convince Rafael this is a good idea, I'll send a
> > new revision with drivers setting the companion.
>
> If you can guarantee that ACPI PM or anything like _DS or _SRS will
> never be invoked for the device objects that "inherit" the ACPI
> companion from their parent, it at least is not outright dangerous.
I'm hoping an ack from Mika will suffice, but please let me know if
there's something I can do to verify or help ensure this.
--Dustin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
